Skip to content

The Mouse That Roared: Fastcase vs. LexisNexis and Westlaw


Online research giants LexisNexis and Thomson Reuters Westlaw provide overwhelming satisfaction to the firms and lawyers who subscribe to their services. 

But despite all that good feeling, a much greater proportion of customers report they are “very likely” to recommend upstart low-cost alternative Fastcase than do customers of either of the giants.

Those are among the more interesting results of the inaugural Law Technology News Vendor Satisfaction Survey, published by ALM at Law.com.  Large and small firms did not significantly differ on how they rated the technology vendors, according to Research director Jennifer Blessman.

When buying technology, lawyers rate customer service responsiveness is the most important element.   77% cited responsiveness, 64% ease of integration into firm workflow, and 61% price for value.

The survey’s 505 respondents included executives; partners and associates; IT, litigation support, paralegals, librarians, and docketing staff; and administrators.

Online research was overwhelmingly the most frequently cited technology, with 366 mentions.  Next in order were document management systems, electronic data discovery tools, and records management software.

Among customers who report themselves as “very likely” to recommend their service, LexisNexis scored 26.5% compared to Thomson Reuters Westlaw’s 20.4%; but Fastcase beats both with 50%.   Survey compilers noted the small universe of Fastcase respondents, plus the near-equal results for all three services when the two most approving choices are combined.

The rise of Fastlaw and other competing services “may be signs that lawyers are shopping for research alternatives,” according to the survey, which quoted one teacher as saying students are increasingly inquiring about free research tools.

That cost consciousness on the part of law firm clients has long been recognized as the motive force in the move to dump hourly billing and make the marketplace for legal services more competitive and consumer friendly.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay

The Mouse That Roared: Fastcase vs. LexisNexis and Westlaw - 18 Comments

  1. I cannot quite get over how much I agree with this top class article. Do post more soon. Best Wishes, Everett Marcet

    Thursday, August 12, 2010 at 3:03 pm | Permalink
  2. This is a great article. Thanks for sharing this.

    Thursday, September 2, 2010 at 6:43 am | Permalink
  3. conveyancing wrote:

    I was pondering on what I’d do with my old three-dimensional devices

    Friday, September 3, 2010 at 9:08 am | Permalink
  4. RoxreveNova wrote:

    I enjoyed reading your blog. Keep it that way.

    Saturday, September 4, 2010 at 3:58 am | Permalink
  5. This can be a superb subject to speak about. Appreciate setting up this website. I’m sure there are tons searching for this sort of dialogue.

    Tuesday, September 21, 2010 at 1:16 am | Permalink
  6. Thanks for posting and sharing with all – Cheers

    Sunday, October 3, 2010 at 2:07 am | Permalink
  7. Thanks for the useful info on this blog. subscribedToronto Insurance

    Sunday, October 3, 2010 at 7:42 pm | Permalink
  8. Admirable blog! I’ll likely be referencing some of this data in my next speech. I would appreciate it when you visited my blog

    Monday, October 18, 2010 at 4:23 am | Permalink
  9. Useful website. Thanks, very well written article.

    Monday, October 18, 2010 at 1:02 pm | Permalink
  10. Aw, this was a really quality post. In theory I’d like to write like this too – taking time and real effort to make a good article… but what can I say… I procrastinate alot and never seem to get something done.

    Sunday, November 14, 2010 at 5:09 pm | Permalink
  11. I’m having a hard time viewing this information from my iPhone. Maybe you could upgrade the site and make it more accessible from my phone. Thatd be real cool!

    Friday, December 3, 2010 at 9:05 pm | Permalink
  12. Excellent to read from a man who really can talk about it.

    Thursday, January 6, 2011 at 9:17 pm | Permalink
  13. Wow! That was a really great article. Please keep writing because I love your style.

    Tuesday, January 11, 2011 at 10:08 am | Permalink
  14. Great article. Waiting for more.

    Tuesday, January 11, 2011 at 12:51 pm | Permalink
  15. Any update on this ? Excellent information keep it up!

    Wednesday, January 19, 2011 at 7:09 am | Permalink
  16. Very useful post. Thank You for taking the time to share it with us.

    Thursday, January 20, 2011 at 3:18 pm | Permalink
  17. When I originally commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added” checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get several e-mails with the same comment. Is there any way you can remove people from that service? Thank you!

    Tuesday, April 12, 2011 at 8:27 am | Permalink
  18. John Spano wrote:

    thanks. I’m concerned to hear that. in other words, for some reason our system is generating multiple copies of the same comment?
    thanks

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 11:13 am | Permalink

The Mouse That Roared: Fastcase vs. LexisNexis and Westlaw - One Trackback/Pingback

  1. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ed Walters, caminick. caminick said: RT @EJWalters: More firms report they are very likely to recommend @Fastcase than either Lexis or Westlaw. Law Forward: http://bit.ly/c9GMIC [...]

The Mouse That Roared: Fastcase vs. LexisNexis and Westlaw - Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*

© LegalZoom.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
Disclaimer: The information provided in this site is not legal advice, but general information on legal issues commonly encountered. LegalZoom is not a law firm and is not a substitute for an attorney or law firm.Communications between you and LegalZoom are protected by our Privacy Policy, but are not protected by the attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine. LegalZoom cannot provide legal advice and can only provide self-help services at your specific direction; LegalZoom cannot provide any kind of advice, explanation, opinion, or recommendation to a consumer about possible legal rights, remedies, defenses, options, selection of forms or strategies. Please note that your access to and use of LegalZoom.com is subject to additional Terms of Use. LegalZoom.com, Inc. is a registered and bonded legal document assistant, #0104, Los Angeles County (exp. 12/13) and is located at 101 N. Brand Blvd., 11th Floor, Glendale, CA 91203.